Women's Nipple Tattoos

Hurricane Obama is just breeze by Robert Montoya

President as a brand no longer sells. The "yes, we can" quickly became in a "no, we can not"

There is still almost a month to ensure compliance with the second anniversary of the arrival of Barack Obama to power, but the American President and it seems a ghost who wanders the halls of disoriented the White House. Obama Superman's flight was too short, too, or maybe not there any flight. He tried to take off and take off to their country and improve the world but failed. The Obama brand no longer sells. The "yes, we can" quickly became a "no, we can not."

heavy defeat after the election that the Democratic Party suffered in November, losing its majority in the House Representatives and holding it for very scarce margin in the Senate, Obama seems to have ended up throwing in the towel. Ignoring the current left and center of his party, the president has decided to once again, your other cheek to the Republican Party.
One of the latest examples of this approach to dialogue was a few days ago, when Obama bowed to Republican pressure, accepting a vital change in its tax reform, one of his major campaign promises. The president agreed to extend for two years the tax cut to those earning more than $ 250,000 a year, a measure approved by George W. Bush and concluded this year. The reform includes a reduction of 120,000 million dollars in Social Security contributions, which further weaken this institution and in the not too distant can assume its full privatization.
Many Democrats understand that these and many other tax concessions to the rich, involving millions of dollars of increased public debt, millions could be spent on job creation. Obama, who has tried to sell the reforms as a success, showing only positive aspects, which also undoubtedly has had a strong internal opposition within the Democratic Party.
proof is 139 while congressional Democrats voted for reform and 112 against, on the Republican side were 138 who voted in favor and only 36 against.
Another star Obama campaign promises, health reform, continues to lose steam. If you are already on the road to adoption had been so many changes that decaf and made unrecognizable from its original idea, in legal terms is finding more and more obstacles in their path.

A federal judge in Virginia has rescinded a few days ago a key part of health reform, considering it unconstitutional. According to Judge Henry Hudson "the Government can not force citizens to buy insurance under threat of being punished. " As often happens in America, this judge is the owner of a Republican consulting firm, Campaign Solutions, which is a client Sarah Palin, a former presidential candidate and now leader of the Tea Party, the ultra current GOP.
Sarah Palin, as Republicans sectors, among which is Eric Cantor himself, the new leader of the Republican majority in the House of Representatives are pushing the amendment called Revocation, which, if successful in both Chambers, would override any federal law, including healthcare reform, provided that a vote of two thirds of the states of the Union.
Republicans, elated by his recent electoral victory, are willing to step up its offensive in the two-year term remaining for Obama, who has completely lost the initiative.
The blows suffered by Obama to their original ideas of health and fiscal reforms, in addition to the failures in many other quarters. The president has failed so far support for legalizing the eleven million undocumented immigrants in the U.S. to another of his big campaign promises.

11 next January, will mark nine years since the arrival of the first prisoners to Guantanamo and Obama has so far failed in its intention to close the detention illegal. It is an open secret that the government is preparing a law that would allow him to retain without charge indefinitely, with 48 of the 174 prisoners still held there.
The issue of human rights progress has not met since coming to power of Obama. Still the Patriot Act (Patriot Act), which allows the State shares of Big Brother about their citizens, without judicial authorization, while disclosure is a criminal offense by civilian organizations such as Wikileaks of thousands and thousands of documents establishing the continues to commit crimes the U.S. military in Iraq or Afghanistan, or conspiraciciones, blackmail and espionage carried out daily by U.S. embassies worldwide.
These documents show that both the armed forces and intelligence services and U.S. diplomats, continue to operate under the Obama administration as they did with Bush. The government now seeks to judge how the visible head of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, under the Espionage Act of 1917, created by a Democratic president, Woodrow Wilson, to punish any citizen who dared to publicly criticize U.S. entry united in the First World War.

Speaking Christmas Obama might just show two real achievements, thanks to a vote of 12 moderate Republicans the Senate vote in favor of new nuclear disarmament agreement with Russia (Start), and the abolition of a law forbidding the military to recognize his homosexuality.
Obama has been losing ground and everything can be expected that this trend is even more pronounced since January, when the two chambers reflect the new balance of parliamentary forces and the republicans use to boycott any government initiative, with the view entry into the presidential election in November 2012.
Hurricane Obama has lost power and was left in a breeze.

Green Metalcore Scooter

The truths revealed in Assange

By Roberto Montoya,

From Wikileaks underground leader threatens to reveal secrets about aliens. The real finds in the mountains of leaks. Julian Assange, the visible face of Wikileaks, chatted this weekend with the readers of British newspaper The Guadian from hiding, presumably from somewhere in south London. They acknowledged that he had received death threats, there is a warrant for his arrest by Interpol against him, but said that in the case of arrest, automatically activate the keys to decrypt important files that have been posted by Wikileaks to 100,000 computers.

Is this part of the war in cyberspace announced XXI century? What's really important in American diplomatic cable leaked to Wikileaks? The documents released so far and which will reveal the five media chosen by that organization is classified material "confidential" or "secret" as appropriate, but never "top secret". All cables used by diplomats from the 11-S Internet system of the U.S. Army called the SIPRNET (Secret Internet Protocol Router Network), which has no level of encryption as sophisticated as that used by the CIA, the NSA and other U.S. intelligence agencies to really top secret communications. Despite this and despite the thousands of cables dominated comments on facts as well known as the corruption of Russian or Afghan government, the "wild parties" of Berlusconi, the fears of Arab countries to the Iranian nuclear power and many others, there are other internal communications that are getting in trouble to some governments.

is the case, for example, in Spain. Both the previous government of right José María Aznar (1996-2004) as the current Socialist leader Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, are revealed about how they were accomplices of the United States to try to close the court cases in Spain in spite of the torture against prisoners in Guantanamo English, for flights of CIA aircraft transporting prisoners who stopped illegally on English territory between 2002 and 2007 and the death of Jose Couso television camera in Baghdad in 2003 by a U.S. tank shell, fired deliberately against the Palestine Hotel which housed much of the international press, witnesses very annoying for the U.S.. "The English ministers work to flourish no arrest warrants, "or" The state attorney general is doing what it can to close the case "or" Moratinos (former foreign minister Rodríguez Zapatero) ensures that de la Vega (former vice president social) has involved "or" The English government does not object to the CIA flights, "are some of the phrases that appear in the many messages sent from Madrid to the U.S. becoming aware of the diplomatic efforts to close these cases as soon as possible criminals.

"I'm losing patience with Spain's position on Iraq," he even said a Cuban-American cable Former U.S. Ambassador, Eduardo Aguirre, a senior adviser to Rodriguez Zapatero, showing the imperial tone used by U.S. diplomats with a foreign government to which he constantly demand explanations. The parliamentary left has demanded an explanation, like Couso's family, who studies judicial file a complaint against prosecutors and policy makers.

In Germany, the cables have been revealed as the first result in dismissal from the leadership of the Liberal Party (FDP) Helmut Metzner, advisor to the president of the party and currently foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, to know that had been confident Metzner U.S. embassy, \u200b\u200bwhich provided sensitive information about the government. Among the other gems that appear in the papers of the State Department revealed, it is clear the president's secret commitment of Algeria, Abdelaziz Butlefika, that in no case will go to war against Morocco but further deterioration of the Sahara, the Yemeni regime's secret agreement with the United States that the U.S. military to attack Al Qaeda in its territory or fears about "the growing Islamization of Turkey."

In Latin America, the cables show concern for the United States because of internal rivalries in the armed forces and widespread corruption in Mexico incapacitate the government to defeat the narcos, or in the case of Venezuela, closely follows the close relationship with Cuba, as well as follow very closely in the footsteps of Iran in Latin America, where suspected of seeking uranium. documents are supposed to continue running for several weeks. Assange He said in his chat on The Guardian, even "not yet published in parts of the State Department documents, there are references to UFOs."

Good Things To Write In A Wedding Book

NATIONAL THINKING? WHAT WAS THAT?; By Luis Mattini

Among the gross distortions that are suffering on the decade of the sixty to seventy which is attributed to all the activism "thoughts" national "," popular "," Peronist "and a string of ideas copious frozen, very hackneyed by now that militancy that seems to believe that achievement of human rights was the goal for which they gave the lives of hundreds of young and old scores. I remember a dinner companion that circumstance has no qualms about additives to their name the title "nephew" because his uncle is a "famous", correct the word "seventy" calling this generation, the generation revolutionary Peronist " without taking into account that we had invented that strange word "seventy", just to cover an ideological, political, programmatic and highly practical, very varied.

Well gentlemen, among those seventies there was the PRT-ERP, which although not large was all we had hoped, we were several thousand and a lot of talk, and not the national sport of the senseless use words, but it was much what we did, I think this is no doubt.

Well gentlemen, it seems necessary to remind them, including former members of the PRT-ERP itself, they forgot or ignored the PRT-ERP was not for nothing "national thinking", nor was it "thinking people", much less had a reading or Catholic, or oligarchical, or revisionist, or populist, or Stalinist history.

The PRT-ERP was defined itself as Marxist-Leninist concept at that time, replaced "national" by international and multi-class "popular" by the workers classism. That meant, in practice, the subjects were we, the industrial workers' vanguard. " In the Political Bureau of the PRT, due to the tenacity of Santucho of eight members, four were workers of big industry: "I exaggerate? Then there are the names: Charles Herman, Luis Mattini, Juan Ledesma, Antonio del Carmen Fernandez. The others were Santucho, Urteaga, Mena and Gorriaran. Someone tell me if you knew something like this in Argentina, both on your PC, such as the Trotskyist parties or Peronism itself. And in America, well, may be Uruguay, Chile and that may stop counting. It goes without saying that I am not making a fuss about this, just remember how things were. (Because, justice orders, moreover also loaded with some "workers" who will voglio dire!! Better to lose to find them)

is also true that PRT favored a revolution carried out by an alliance of character class and popular. " That is, (and pardon the irony, but it's true) we were not "popular" folk would be our allies. Because the TRP "popular" was a sociological category below the class. Something like today when we speak of "progressive" rather than revolutionary. Besides trostkysta origin, our tendency, led by Mario Roberto Santucho, adopted as a guide Guevarism tactics and ethical content, overcomes the Stalinist nightmare (it does not entail having been vaccinated against Stalinism.)

course, the current neo-populist Peronist home are as Stalinists, I understand, I understand I can not help my sympathy. The idea of \u200b\u200b"popular" gives them a place, the law allows them to be "cutting edge" and not "petty bourgeois" groundless epithet that should suffer Leninist parties of the time. Poor things! We must recognize that Marxism-Leninism was indeed aristocratic, only the workers, and within these industrial-could be "cutting edge." It must be said that the very Santucho not escape this dogma. I enjoy that, because Colorado is the complaint of Vincent's daughter's book of Roby, which relates that Santucho challenged him for not having joined Mattini Central Committee, when he, Santucho, was in jail.

Of course, the PRT-ERP, never believed that the revolution could do only with the vanguard of the working class and therefore had profound tactical agreements with the organizations of origin and also Peronist Montoneros. (That is the "popular") but make no mistake gentlemen tactical agreements and respect their beliefs. But we did not share much beyond the prospect of taking power and launch into a socialist Argentina, as a project yet to be created. That was no small thing, but did not mean that visions we shared philosophical, ethical, historical and class to these sectors. Of course it must be recognized that if history teaches us is stubborn, is that within the PRT were also frequent the "popular", it just looked Campora saw in 73 and only the power and prestige could control the situation Santucho , driving without fuss. Otherwise we would have diluted in a larger group of populists. However, in view of the flirtation with the current government, I see that was more than I thought.

We must be clear. We who follow Santucho, we were not Christians, did not think in the "national bourgeoisie" or seduced us essayists "national and popular" now so fashionable in those days knew only about "lackey" and required him to Cortazar heard "right? If, Julio Cortazar, who returned to Argentina in order to "write for the people." Nor is not the case "compare" Che to Evita, simply because they are so different that they are incomparable.

Our enemy was landed oligarchy and the large agricultural and industrial bourgeoisie, which did not consider "sepoy" but a member of imperialism. In what is now called "middle class" the objective we considered an ally, but he had such confidence that we tried not to recruit people of the social sector, we were convinced that only the working class should be the driver of a process that was national and international as the content, leading the allies to the rural and urban petty bourgeoisie (ie the middle and poor peasants) to the militant intelligentsia and the "urban poor", as we called others said the slum dwellers.

repeat if it is not clear: national in form only, so we were not nationalists, we were internationalists, or a world propiciábamos without borders or flags. We knew some languages, but enough to know that in the Germanic languages \u200b\u200bthe adjective goes before the noun, therefore "national socialism" exactly means in German "national socialism", without national socialism so everything was always Fascist as national models of socialism forms were numerous. .

But above all things, at least on the facts, and perhaps without knowing it, were deeply immanent, ie, we believed that history is made by human subjects by choice, here and now and not on a transcendent predetermined plan from outside, is given God, by Providence or abstract terms. This content is perhaps the most absent today. also did not accept the subjunctive, the "have". We did not believe that if the farmer landowner Juan Manuel de Rosas "had" won the battle of Caseros, the English "have" lost influence in national history. For something Rosas died in exile in England. (Ah, that rare thing, right? His tomb was very close to that of Karl Marx, but so are the exoteric English)

The PRT-ERP studied much history, because history is the teacher of disciplines. The real story learn. But we were committed Marxists body and soul into a proletarian revolution, so that, faithful to that commitment, it is natural that we should seek to escape the influence of bourgeois ideology. And, of course, Peronism, and radicalism, was a bourgeois ideology. Or do you doubt? Do you have any doubts that Pacho O'Donnell is so bourgeois as Romero? The difference in favor of Romero is on one hand he denies it and the other is an intellectual, politically stable and predictable, a highly professional science scholar, not a Type. and therefore his work is more likely to draw our own conclusions.

course, we could not prevent science being in the hands of the bourgeoisie in streams of various shades and interests. "By the way as they are today even in universities alleged" popular "as the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, or even as the Cuban socialist, and repeat the academic models and social practices of universities have emerged of official bourgeois modernity where the use of professional title has replaced the title of nobility "At both the PRT tried to follow the professional historians, knowing that no one is devoid of ideology and reality is always complex. And while we clearly taught by Marx, men tend to respond to class interests, the history also teaches that there were many men who emancipated themselves from the class interests to act in the interests, say, human. Or do you believe that Che Guevara was responding to class interests? For those uninterested are going to find at the University of Berlin, at the Sorbonne, in Havana, in the UBA and may in some cases in Mothers of Plaza de Mayo

How to deciding when to respond or not interest of certain classes? It was not easy, but good advice is to keep the subject's behavior, not words: We must begin to distinguish the practitioners of a conservative, liberal, Catholics, Communists, of mere scribes. The former are obviously ideology, from right to left thinking with their own heads, because to achieve real impact on knowledge should at least control their own ideological prejudices, try to prevent the condition, open to ideas and practices. Otherwise the bourgeoisie had not developed the way science did. Instead these scribes have no ideology, write to order. Follow commands. May be at the request of political power, as the market.
And it is very worrying greening of scribes at this time in Argentina, which seems to be a consequence of the incredible commodification, to which is added the institutionalization of grassroots organizations. I can assure that the latter is not even an Argentine invention, is a Swedish invention. You ask it, how he solved the Swedish social influence of the French May to late sixties. Just keep in mind that soybean yields more dividends to Swedish industry. Then

also applies to follow the action of men in the history Notice: José de San Martín, who was a professional of arms, freed American genius and talent, creativity, political courage, selflessness and, above all, by So after completing their mission, retired into exile without being involved in subsequent disputes. In his memorial of Boulogne Sur Mer says its best tribute, saying: "General Argentino relinquished power" that I know the other one was also resigned to Argentina, Che Guevara.

In contrast, Simon Bolivar, who was a farmer turned general, also had great talent, audacity and creativity to free America, but finish the job, kept fighting and fought to disarm indigenous farming communities, for ranchers. You grip on power by founding a republic which bears his name, imposed by the Creoles, not by Aborigines, Bolivia, dividing that Upper Peru, which was, along with Mexico, one of the most developed indigenous cultures. Accordingly, TRP, was entitled sanmartiniano, as well as Che Guevara, people who did not interest us personal power, but was hardly Bolivarian, the man who destroyed the indigenous community and Upper Peru in favor of a "native" ( daughter read English) and especially landowner "Great Colombia".

course, "sanmartiniano" sounds very close to the Argentine military because they have a foundation that name. Instead Bolivarian seems "more national and popular." Well, sorry, but I will not let me steal the military. All because in effect, the General San Martin was a commoner born in Corrientes, probably the son of an Indian, half-ascetic, rigorous training talented official, undisputed genius, comparable only to the great military history, whereas the other was an aristocratic landowner, known as pompous, linked to the ruling class in Venezuela, and some royal world come to general circumstances.

that the Argentine military to take the formality of the supposedly ascetic aspect of General San Martin, I have carelessly. I did not value people or by asceticism or by the directions. I can only worry about what resources are paid the rumba. But the undisputed merit of San Martin was giving up power after America liberated

For its part, Belgrano, attorney general had to take like not even know how to ride a horse in a country of Gauchos, he did so without hesitation and with unexpected efficiency. He dedicated his life to it, dying in poverty. Can you tell what class interests represented? Walked the same path Monteagudo, Castelli, Moreno himself.

Instead Rosas, who does not need to insist it was a big livestock organized the first "conquest of the desert to reclaim land for farming, repression of indigenous nationalists who systematically forget, even the" popular. " Sure, it was not genocide as Rock, the Indians who surrendered were favored place like feudal vassals on farms that still exist today in certain provinces.

This happened in general seems to have learned from the British to win all wars losing all the battles: Bartolomé Mitre was also a man conspiscuo defended oligarchy oligarchic interests, besides having led the War of Paraguay, action war of extermination, almost genocide, the most infamous in our history. However, on the other side and several other things, Mitre raided by historical discipline. Let's say that as a historian is not a genius, but not much worse than others. Mitre deny the competence as a historian he was a representative of the oligarchy, is like denying the talent of Balzac because he was a monarchist. Moreover Mitre was not so reactionary as Jose Maria Rosa, much less a repentant as Manuel Gálvez, who climbed the tree to the left and down the right. And frankly, gentlemen, if in a matter of ideas force me to choose, I'll stick to liberalism rather than with Catholicism. National and popular gentlemen, you seem to forget that Catholicism has always been and still is - synonymous with reaction. (Priests of the Third World are too recent and few)

Anyway .. what I mean is that the harmful conduct of Mitre as ruler, not as an intellectual disabled. Of it is not advisable to read his translation of Dante because, experts say, is so bad that there was an attempted declaration of war from Italy to Argentina for having offended the Italian culture. But despite that, Mitre has respectable historical texts. For some the banned Videla dictatorship "War of the Republiquetas" Bartolomé Mitre book that Che was in his backpack and Santucho always recommended. The very "Historia de San Martín" Mitre is not the summum of a story, but no worse than others, especially is much better than any written by dialectical materialists attribute the action of our General, that they relinquished power , his "objective" class position, to the point of denying their status almost desiring subject ..

The problem of so-called historical revisionism is rampant in our days by the Queen as scribes scribes of the market, not to their supposed different interpretation of history that would be good, an enrichment the possibility of interesting debates. No, the problem with these journalists, historians alleged that take serials like rabbits from the hat, is the lack of seriousness, unimaginable and gross superficial ideological, bastard historical facts for the sole purpose of justifying the present. It can no longer Mitre he died decades ago.

But also defends the history of writing fills of slapping, ie history is a discipline that cares only because he lives teaching: the revisionists do not understand how they learn. Notice, for example, with respect to British imperialism. Railroads were one of the symbols interference over the English in Argentina, an issue particularly denounced by Scalabrini Ortiz. Well, Perón was a wonderful act of unquestioned historical justice, an act that was worth more than tons of pages: nationalized. Grande Perón, so big that even I erased the names they had put the British (Central Argentine Railway, South FC, FC Pacific, etc ... ..) and gave them national names, yes sir, good national names because they like it or not, these people were born in Argentina: Mitre, Sarmiento and Roca, and of course San Martin and Belgrano also. How do you explain this man who learned from Marx to be a nationalist Jew and always remember to Codovilla walking with an open umbrella on a sunny afternoon, as he explains, saying that General Peron in this magnificent act of historical justice, has christened with names of "traitors" like Mitre, Roca, and Sarmiento, the nationalized railways?

Stop, stop, do not follow invented ... not that the "oligarchy" Perón pushed ... I know I will explain: Why Perón was no revisionist, nor Rosas, nor anti-Semitic, or Catholic nationalist, Perón was Peronist, for better or for worse, Perón was primarily Peronist, and Peron was as free of bias as befits the great pragmatic era. That is a great case of immanence, did his work inspired by the divine or historical significance, but in its immanent will. Also, if anyone knew of history, not just national, but universal, was Perón. And he knew that those people are the major drivers of the railroads.

And finally for now, for better or for worse, "I am convinced that good because I am and always was a convinced internationalist," PRT "of Santucho" was primarily staunchly internationalist and class Guevara. The Populists, who were clearly in error in the PRT, which now bloom generously irrigated by this government have the right to make your own, right to self-criticism, repentance, or whatever they want, just ask that, by silence or omission, not appropriate for this part of history.

Maroon Christmas Decor

COUP OF BANKING AND LARGE COMPANIES, Jose Manuel Martin Medem

propose to reestablish Spain's monarchy with a constitutional contrareforma. Considered a virus harmful and undesirable citizens who have no capacity for sacrifice

owners of economic power have gone over the government and Parliament and led the king a proposal to "re-Spain (1), speaking as soon as possible to change the constitutional level and impose a new model of state."

As if the big companies have the right to act without taking into account the democratic will of the people, BSCH, BBVA, La Caixa, Telefónica, Repsol, E. ON, Endesa, Iberdrola, Prisa, Planeta another forty of the most important companies in the country have decided that "a cycle ends and another begins requiring structural changes and urgent." They believe that "the important thing is not having more or less rights but pacts of State to create and institutionalize a new driving scheme and planning of the country. "They raise the crown to submit to the major parties to" change the model state with effective and efficient mechanisms to ensure adequate and continuous alignment. "They demand for the model Counter-autonomous and require citizens "self-sacrifice (2) for a welfare state responsible urgent and thorough review of the pension system, labor market, collective bargaining, the procedures for hiring and firing costs and causes."

Banks and large companies insist that "change the model state is the most important decision in the transformation process to re Spain.
The arrogance of economic power against democracy.
a coup.
_____________________________________________

(1) Everis Foundation, chaired by Eduardo Serra, King presented the report Transform Spain sponsored by fifty large companies.

(2) The banks and the big companies are asking the city ability to adapt: \u200b\u200b"Whoever does not enter (because no
can or do not want) the paradigms of evolution Darwinian (continuous improvement and constant renewal) is doomed or, worse, to survive weighing on the rest of the system as a harmful and undesirable
virus.